The NCAA’s decision to eliminate the spring transfer portal window represents another change to college football’s evolving landscape.
For years, the spring window was both a blessing and a headache for coaches. It give athletes a last chance to switch schools after spring practice, but also left coaches scrambling to fill sudden roster holes. By running with a single offseason window, the NCAA is responding directly to feedback from both players and coaches, though the move carries implications that will particularly affect top-tier programs.
Why the Spring window disappeared
The spring portal was created to give players flexibility, but it quickly became chaotic. Last year alone, more than 1,100 scholarship players entered the transfer database. For coaches, this meant unexpected roster turnover after spring camp, when depth charts were already set and scholarship limits made replacing talent nearly impossible.
Additionally, the spring window became a negotiating tool for players and their representatives, who could leverage the threat of transferring to demand more NIL money. Coaches also used it to cut underperformers. This led to even more instability. By removing the spring option, the NCAA is attempting to restore order to roster management.
A January-only window
The proposed reform would funnel all undergraduate and graduate transfers into a 10-day period in early January, beginning right after the College Football Playoff quarterfinals. This timing is designed to relieve December’s overloaded calendar, which already includes bowl preparation, high school signing day, and coaching changes. However, not everyone is pleased.
Ohio State’s Ryan Day recently argued that requiring playoff-bound coaches to juggle transfer recruiting in January makes little sense. But the debate shows how this change could affect programs competing for championships versus those in rebuilding mode.
"No, I don't think it's a good idea at all," Day told reporters last week. "The conversations we had with the Big Ten coaches, I think the majority of them agree. I just don't quite understand how teams that are playing in the playoffs are expected to make the decisions and sign their upcoming players while they're still getting ready to play for games. It doesn't make any sense to me."
MORE: Brian Kelly fires back at Ryan Day's rebuke of transfer portal changes
Spotlight on Deion Sanders and similar coaches
Few coaches have leveraged the transfer portal as aggressively as Colorado’s Deion Sanders. Since arriving in Boulder, “Coach Prime” has flipped his roster at a pace unlike any in modern college football, with both winter and spring periods built into his strategy.
The elimination of the spring window directly limits his approach. No longer can Sanders trim his roster after spring practice or add late talent. Instead, roster construction come in January. This means quicker decision-making in the process.
Sanders isn't alone. Arizona State, Houston, Nebraska and others who use the portal like NFL free agency will be under the same deadline. The NCAA’s shift may level the playing field. But it may also push creative recruiters like Sanders to double down on their aggressive strategies.
In the end, the move will try to balance what's best for athletes and programs.
MORE COLLEGE FOOTBALL NEWS:
- Deion Sanders buyout, contract details as Colorado Buffaloes coach
- Nick Saban on Browns' Derrick Henry diss: Try 'tackling his ass every day'
- LSU lands top 2027 blue-chip QB Peyton Houston
- The hard truth about Arch Manning's injury situation
- Why Shedeur Sanders told NFL teams not to draft him