As former professional basketball players such as Thierry Darlan and London Johnson gain eligibility to play in college, the NCAA faces mounting questions about where the line should be drawn between amateur and professional competition.
Darlan and Johnson, both having spent time in the NBA G League, highlight a growing trend of pro-experience players entering the college environment. Their presence raises issues around eligibility standards, NIL era implications and competitive balance. Critics argue the infusion of former pros may undermine the amateur ethos of college sports, while proponents contend it elevates competition and prepares athletes more fully for post-college careers.
Some big-name coaches have weighed in recently via a report by SI. "Michigan State’s Tom Izzo called it “ridiculous” and “embarrassing” for the sport. Kansas’s Bill Self said he had “no idea what we are doing” and quipped that his staff would call NBA teams to find players to recruit off of instead of high school kids. Purdue’s Matt Painter was “at a loss for words” over the development."
NCAA officials are increasingly required to scrutinize logical consistency in eligibility decisions and to clarify precedent. The optics become more complex when players with prior earnings and professional contracts compete against traditional student-athletes.
Some former and current NBA players have started to speculate if they still have eligibility to use. Giannis Antetokounmpo, who started his career in Greece, has openly pondered the idea of dominating in college. Damian Lillard also floated the idea of returning to Weber State.
As the college landscape continues to evolve, the NCAA’s decisions on cases like these may set the tone for future inclusion or restriction of pro-experienced athletes.
More college basketball news:
Duke Basketball one-and-done makes NBA history, earns Player of the Week honors
Bruce Pearl becomes Auburn super fan during son's loss to No. 1 Houston